Capacity to revoke or to make a lifetime gift
We address the related but legally distinct tests for capacity to revoke a will, to make a lifetime gift, and to enter into lasting powers of attorney.
Case type
Probate disputes frequently turn on whether the testator had testamentary capacity at the time the will was made, applying the test in Banks v Goodfellow (1870) (and increasingly the Mental Capacity Act 2005). Retrospective psychiatric assessment of the deceased, based on medical records and witness accounts, is often required.
A short summary plus the items below is enough for us to match an expert and confirm the deadline — you don't need the full bundle to get a quote.
Probate disputes about testamentary capacity require a retrospective psychiatric assessment of a person who is, by definition, no longer available for examination. The opinion must be built from contemporaneous GP and hospital records, witness statements, the will file and any solicitor's attendance notes.
We instruct old age psychiatrists and neuropsychiatrists with substantive experience of retrospective capacity work and of giving evidence in the Chancery Division and County Court probate lists.
Reports apply the Banks v Goodfellow test for testamentary capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 where appropriate, and the principles in Re Loxston / Walker v Badmin.
Drop any of these straight into your letter of instruction.
We address the related but legally distinct tests for capacity to revoke a will, to make a lifetime gift, and to enter into lasting powers of attorney.
Where the testator had a diagnosis of dementia, the question is rarely whether they had capacity at any point but whether they had capacity on the specific date of execution. We address the trajectory of the disease and the available windows of capacity.
Reports apply the four-limb Banks v Goodfellow test, understanding the nature of the act, the extent of the property, the claims of those who might expect to benefit, and the absence of any disorder of the mind that perverts the disposition. We address each limb separately and against the contemporaneous evidence.
Reports address whether the testator's mental state, through depression, dependency, delusional disorder or cognitive impairment, made them susceptible to undue influence at the relevant time.
Tell us about your case and we'll match you to the right consultant, usually within 24 hours.